Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Literal Interpretations vs. Genuine Inspiration



When it comes to artists inspiring fashion designers, there does not seem to be much written in academic journals. Most of what I’ve seen discussing designers and their inspirations is more current and straight out of the reviews. I did find a few interesting tidbits which will give me enough material to investigate the difference between literal interpretation and genuine inspiration.

The first (useful) article I found is 5 Famous Artists Who Influenced Fashion Designers. Scrolling through the pictures I found what I would call literal interpretations. The Versace pieces that take after Andy Warhol’s Marilyn pictures are literally just screenprinted with the same image. There is not much of the designer’s own filter showing up there. It would be hard to create anything inspired more literally than that. The same goes for Rodarte’s Starry Night dress. That one doesn’t even attempt to have the shape of the dress match the mood of the painting—it pretty literally just uses fabric with the painting printed on it, once again. At least Yves St. Laurent made something new and compelling out of his Mondrian painting—the dress stands on its own and creates a new fashion aesthetic—though it is still quite literal in its interpretation. Dali’s lobster dress never quite makes it past being a dress with a picture of a lobster on it.

Contrast those designs with some by master couturier John Galliano, who has designed for both Givenchy and Christian Dior. He works with his inspirations in an entirely different way. He is influenced by them and, critically, reinterprets them. His dresses are both unmistakably his own, and unmistakably inspired by the art of others. As you can see in this video of Galliano discussing some of the landmark dresses of the House of Dior, he designed two of the dresses after recognizable art—in this case, Venetian masquerades (at 2:50) and artist Egon Schiele (at 3:15).  Both creations embody the essence of his inspirations and are beautiful and amazing in their own right.

It seems to me that the difference in these two approaches is what separates the hacks from the true design artists. How can someone take inspiration from outside and still create something truly in his or her own voice? Is it personality traits at work? Confidence? Extensive experience? I’m excited to delve further into this topic as we move forward.

3 comments:

  1. I like that you picked fashion and the influence of designs. You are off to a much better start with your research than I am. The video you posted helps to view what you want to research. The inspirations from both designers was amazing. Beautiful dresses.
    I hope you are able to find more pictures of these type of designs for your future posts. I enjoyed watching and looking through the pictures.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting. I haven't ever really thought of that before. Something I have wondered is how certain fashion ideas actually become trendy. A lot of it looks so strange on the runway to a lot of people. So how are things chosen and actually seen as acceptable attire?

    Also, I was wondering: have you ever heard of Gustav Klimt? He is one of the first artists who made flora and women popular both in fashion and in fine art.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Somewhat related to your issue is the idea of intellectual property in fashion. At what point is being inspired by someone else "stealing"? Here's a PBS article on the issue: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/opinion/cramping-our-style/3865/

    ReplyDelete